FR
English 
Dansk 
Deutsch 
Español 
Hrvatski 
Indonesia 
Italiano 
Magyar 
Nederlands 
Norsk 
Polski 
Português 
Română 
Suomi 
Svenska 
Tiếng Việt 
Türkçe 
Čeština 
Ελληνικά 
Русский 
Українська 
български 
ไทย 
日本語 
简体中文 
한국어 
עברית 
العربية 
On ne peut pas comparer tailscale aux autres service de VPN. Le besoin n'est pas le même. Il ne s'agit pas là d'avoir un point de sortie (même si c'est possible avec son propre serveur). Il s'agit de relier des machines distantes sans avoir besoin de faire la moindre configuration.
Easy to set up, easy to handle, works, ACL access control list is very easy to set up and allows a dynamical configuration of access rules for all clients in the same VPN net. With Headscale you have the option to run your own local VPN host. You may find negative comments but not really useful: ex. DENNIS SCHRÖDER: "PublicKeys somewhere on some server", "Much more data is stored on the Tailscale servers". Best answers: "The public key is there to be distributed. And what other data is stored at Tailscale? Criticism is good, but it should be backed up.":) Maybe the tester was paid by VPN providers with costs!
Easy to set up, easy to manage remote NASs, and backup site to site. It's great for PC, NAS, and Mobile Devices. I’m not interested in torrenting or streaming, just secure, fast backups. If you’re that worried about privacy you’d better delete your Facebook, Google, and Amazon accounts.
