FR
English 
Dansk 
Deutsch 
Español 
Hrvatski 
Indonesia 
Italiano 
Magyar 
Nederlands 
Norsk 
Polski 
Português 
Română 
Suomi 
Svenska 
Tiếng Việt 
Türkçe 
Čeština 
Ελληνικά 
Русский 
Українська 
български 
ไทย 
日本語 
简体中文 
한국어 
עברית 
العربية 
On ne peut pas comparer tailscale aux autres service de VPN. Le besoin n'est pas le même. Il ne s'agit pas là d'avoir un point de sortie (même si c'est possible avec son propre serveur). Il s'agit de relier des machines distantes sans avoir besoin de faire la moindre configuration.
This review is somewhat missing the point in expecting it to be a normal vpn that everybody thinks of for streaming. The VPN acronym has been bastardised in this era. This is a VPN in the true sense of the word, a Very Private Network and what its meant to be when VPN was coined in the first instance. It only belongs to the user who sets it up. The server belongs to the user NOT to some company who has hundreds of global server presence. With Tailscale, you can actually stream through it, the process and connection works the same way, just not the way 90% of users think how it is including this review.
Easy to set up, easy to handle, works, ACL access control list is very easy to set up and allows a dynamical configuration of access rules for all clients in the same VPN net. With Headscale you have the option to run your own local VPN host. You may find negative comments but not really useful: ex. DENNIS SCHRÖDER: "PublicKeys somewhere on some server", "Much more data is stored on the Tailscale servers". Best answers: "The public key is there to be distributed. And what other data is stored at Tailscale? Criticism is good, but it should be backed up.":) Maybe the tester was paid by VPN providers with costs!
